0000-interleave-iter

[Gankra]

No description provided.

[sinistersnare]

I don't think an RFC is needed for changes like this, at least until post 1.0 and post library stabilization.

std::iter is marked experimental, so people should expect changes like this.

More clarification is needed on what requires an RFC or not.

[pnkfelix]

cc: rust-lang/rust#15886

[pnkfelix]

This RFC was my fault; I gave @gankro bad advice on IRC, because I thought that the core team would probably prefer for changes to libcore to go through some sort of review. Telling @gankro to use the RFC process was probably a mistake. Maybe http://discuss.rust-lang.org would be a better forum for some initial discussion and/or resolution of outstanding questions.

[sinistersnare]

I agree with using Discourse instead of the RFC process for the final stages of the original pull request.

[Gankra]

So to be clear, you guys are recommending I close this pull request, and just make a thread on discuss to the tune of "hey, is everyone cool with this thing I wrote"?

[sinistersnare]

@gankro I fully agree with that sentiment.

[Gankra]

Works for me.

[Gankra]

Moved to disuss: http://discuss.rust-lang.org/t/pseudo-rfc-interleave-iterator/249