-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inferior completion suggesions (and what to do with them?) #3752
Comments
There's nothing wrong with your setup. There are limitations regarding associated types: see #2603 and the others that end up pointing to rust-lang/chalk#234. Besides that, the |
Thanks for prompt reply @lnicola ! I will be monitoring progress wrt to |
Let's close this for now and please report back if fixing |
That's incorrect, |
Implement SHA256 SIMD intrinsics on x86 Disclaimer: this is my first contribution to `miri`'s code. It's quite possible I'm missing something. This code works but may not be the cleanest/best possible. It'd be useful to be able to verify code implementing SHA256 using SIMD since such code is a bit more complicated and at some points requires use of pointers. Until now `miri` didn't support x86 SHA256 intrinsics. This commit implements them.
Hi every so often I try use rust-analyzer. Right now my setup is vim with RLS and Clion with Rust plugin and I am really enthusiastic about rust analyzer.
Unfortunately completion suggestions are really poor. I am trying to understand whether there is something wrong with my rust-analyzer setup or completion suggestions are indeed not as good as I wish them to be.
Here is the same snippet of code with completion options on RLS(vim), rust-analyzer (both vscode and vim) and Clion with Rust plugin
Idea:
RLS(vim)
rust-analyzer (both vscode and vim have same completions suggestions)
Is there something I can do to get better suggestions?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: