Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Steering issue #3 #8486

Closed
3 of 5 tasks
matklad opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed
3 of 5 tasks

Steering issue #3 #8486

matklad opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
S-actionable Someone could pick this issue up and work on it right now

Comments

@matklad
Copy link
Member

matklad commented Apr 12, 2021

This the steering issue -- it documents our roadmap for the next six weeks!

Steering meeting: link

The overall theme of the sprint is fixing broken windows. Specific subissues:

  • change process to leave no broken windows behind. This is not specific issue, but rather a signal that we are changing our attitude to be more quality focused. It's time, to slow down to speed up. @matklad wants to triage existing issues though, to check if there are any obvious broken windows.
  • unfreeze Tracking issue fo RFC2912, transition to rust-analyzer as our official LSP #4224. That was blocked on org changes/foundation formation. Now seems the appropriate time to re-visit org blockers here?
  • add benchmarking for auto-completion and optimize performance so that completion feels fast.
  • support for attribute proc-macros. This is the final big piece we need for rustc feature parity for IDE-relevant subset. The rest is just fixing bugs :-)
  • correctly handle "duplicated" crates in the crate graph. I.e, when cfg(test) crate depends on itself without cfg(test).
@matklad
Copy link
Member Author

matklad commented May 24, 2021

Results:

  • broken windows process seems to work OK-ish
  • we emailed core-team on Tracking issue fo RFC2912, transition to rust-analyzer as our official LSP #4224, received a (preliminary) reply, so this slowly moves forward
  • attribute proc macros support are in progress -- we don't support them yet, but sucesfully broke previously working code in a couple of interesting ways :-)
  • no progress on duplicated crates in the crate graph :(

@matklad matklad closed this as completed May 24, 2021
@matklad matklad mentioned this issue May 24, 2021
6 tasks
@matklad matklad unpinned this issue May 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-actionable Someone could pick this issue up and work on it right now
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant