Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

internal: Add triagebot no-merges config #15358

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Veykril
Copy link
Member

@Veykril Veykril commented Jul 30, 2023

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 30, 2023
@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Aug 1, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2023

📌 Commit 4172dcc has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 4172dcc with merge 43ecf29...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing 43ecf29 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 43ecf29 into rust-lang:master Aug 1, 2023
9 checks passed
@lnicola lnicola changed the title Add triagebot no-merges config internal: Add triagebot no-merges config Aug 1, 2023
@Veykril Veykril deleted the no-merges branch August 2, 2023 08:09
@pitaj
Copy link
Contributor

pitaj commented Sep 2, 2023

Hey FYI, this isn't currently working because the has-merge-commits label doesn't exist yet, causing the bot to error internally.

Someone will need to create that label, and then it should begin to work.

@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Sep 2, 2023

Ah, I only added the sync label right. Fixed it, thanks for telling :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants