Skip to content

Skip #[test_case] expansion #18275

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

darichey
Copy link
Contributor

@darichey darichey commented Oct 10, 2024

Fixes #18274, although I don't fully understand if this is the best fix (it's not clear to me why this didn't cause issues before #18085).

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 10, 2024
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Oct 14, 2024

The issue itself seems a bit weird I agree, either way this sounds correct to me to do anyways as we handle both #[bench] and #[test] this way
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 14, 2024

📌 Commit 3d6acb3 has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 14, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 3d6acb3 with merge c560660...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 14, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing c560660 to master...

@bors bors merged commit c560660 into rust-lang:master Oct 14, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rust-analyzer hangs with too many #[test_case]s
4 participants