Arg count mismatch diagnostic: Handle tuple struct/variant ctors #5283
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
matklad
reviewed
Jul 10, 2020
| Tup(0); | ||
| } | ||
| ", | ||
| expect![["\"Tup(0)\": Expected 2 arguments, found 1\n"]], |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually now that I look at it, annotaed tests might be even better here
struct Tup(u8, u16);
fn f() {
Tup(0);
//^^^^^^ Expected 2 arguments, found 1
}
but maybe not -- multiline spans would be awkward. See inlay_hints.rs for how such tests feel
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I didn't know
callable_item_signaturewas a thing, that makes this really easy.bors r+