feat: Emit test names in Run test runnables if they come from a macro expansion
#9449
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @matklad |
Veykril
changed the title
Run test runnables if they come from a macro expansion
matklad
reviewed
Jul 4, 2021
|
Let me take a look if I can refactor this better then! bors r+ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #8964
Before:
After:
Basically when a macro emits more than one test we name the test functions/modules name in the runnable instead to not emit a bunch of equally named
Run Testannotations which don't really tell much.Note that the
Run fibonacci_test Testsline is below the attributes due to the fact that the function name span is being reused for the generated module in rstest's expansion.