Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[misrefactored_assign_op]: Fix duplicate diagnostics #12413

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

high-cloud
Copy link
Contributor

Relate to #12379

The following diagnostics appear twice

  --> tests/ui/assign_ops2.rs:26:5
   |
LL |     a *= a * a;
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^
   |
help: did you mean `a = a * a` or `a = a * a * a`? Consider replacing it with

because a (lhs) appears in both left operand and right operand in the right hand side.
This PR fixes the issue so that if a diagnostic is created for an operand, the check of the other operand will be skipped. It's fine because the result is always the same in the affected operators.

changelog: [misrefactored_assign_op]: Fix duplicate diagnostics

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 4, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @llogiq (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Mar 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@flip1995 flip1995 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I love how those duplicated diags get addressed one by one right now! Especially by first time contributors. Thanks and welcome to Clippy!

LGTM, blessing the tests seemed to have gone wrong. Please run cargo bless and squash that into your commit, then this is good to go.

@high-cloud
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for advice. I have updated assign_ops2.stderr now. @rustbot review

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Mar 5, 2024

@bors r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2024

📌 Commit 3c5008e has been approved by flip1995

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 3c5008e with merge 2d9d404...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 2d9d404 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 2d9d404 into rust-lang:master Mar 5, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants