Skip to content

fix: remove unnecessary filter_map usages #13548

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

wowinter13
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #12556

(Fixed version of #12766)

changelog: [unnecessary_filter_map]: filter map improvements

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 14, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @llogiq (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@llogiq llogiq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The suggestion can be shortened, otherwise this looks good.

cx,
if name == "filter_map" {
UNNECESSARY_FILTER_MAP
} else {
UNNECESSARY_FIND_MAP
},
expr.span,
format!("this `.{name}` can be written more simply using `.{sugg}`"),
format!("this `.{name}` can be written more simply"),
format!("try replacing with `.{sugg}`"),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doubles the suggestion in the output. Please reduce the text to "try instead" or "replace with".

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@llogiq fixed, thanks!

@wowinter13 wowinter13 requested a review from llogiq October 15, 2024 23:43
@wowinter13
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

llogiq commented Oct 27, 2024

Thank you! @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 27, 2024

📌 Commit ad002ea has been approved by llogiq

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 27, 2024

⌛ Testing commit ad002ea with merge 73bad36...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 27, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: llogiq
Pushing 73bad36 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 73bad36 into rust-lang:master Oct 27, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggest removing filter_map for Iterator::filter_map(|x| Some(x))
4 participants