Skip to content

Remove Known problems section for vec_box #14252

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

alex-semenyuk
Copy link
Member

Remove Known problems section for vec_box since issue

Vec<Box<T: Sized>> makes sense if T is a large type

can be handled

The lint already checks that the type's size is lower than a threshold to avoid linting on large types.

changelog: none

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 19, 2025

r? @llogiq

rustbot has assigned @llogiq.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Feb 19, 2025
@alex-semenyuk
Copy link
Member Author

r? clippy

@rustbot rustbot assigned Alexendoo and unassigned llogiq Mar 5, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Alexendoo Alexendoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@Alexendoo Alexendoo added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 5, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 8108bd8 Mar 5, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants