Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rustup #3889
Rustup #3889
Changes from all commits
31435cd
dcbd3ae
8eadbfd
2d8618e
dae5c9c
254fad9
3c4616d
180e07e
4832a85
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You should import
Ty
and always refer to it unqualified - that's at least the rustc convention.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, random note, cc @Manishearth @oli-obk: this looks like it could use the
ty::relate
infrastructure.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
&x.field
, whenx: &T
, is&(*x).field
, so when you want the whole thing instead of the field, you can write justx
(&x
happens to work, but it's because deref coercions stripping the&
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This sounds like a false positive - is an issue filled?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really a FP:
Since
type Error = !
and we calllet mut path = print_prefix(self)?;
, the?
is a diverging sub-expression. IMO allowing this here is ok.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I disagree,
?
with a diverging error path should not be warned against, the behavior is more like that oflet Ok(mut path) = print_prefix(self);
.cc @Manishearth @oli-obk