Skip to content

Merge backport branches back into tree #4103

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

Manishearth
Copy link
Member

This does nothing to the code, however it keeps the backport branches in master history, so that deleting a branch won't accidentally break old rustc builds

Another option is to keep all these merges in a separate single branch.

thoughts?

r? @oli-obk

changelog: none

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented May 17, 2019

I'm fine with merging them into master so we don't have to keep additional branches around

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

Added the latest beta backport too

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to wait for the Symbol craziness to land first, and then we can merge this

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

what

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

oh.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2019
Merge backport branches into master

Attempt 2 at #4103

This does nothing to the code, however it keeps the backport branches in master history, so that deleting a branch won't accidentally break old rustc builds
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2019
Merge backport branches into master

Attempt 2 at #4103

This does nothing to the code, however it keeps the backport branches in master history, so that deleting a branch won't accidentally break old rustc builds
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants