Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

don't strip blank lines in lint documentation #4229

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2019

Conversation

euclio
Copy link
Contributor

@euclio euclio commented Jun 23, 2019

changelog: don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

Fixes #4116.

This PR also switches the docs headings to deterministically display in the order that they are declared in the source, with "Configuration" always appearing last. It doesn't seem like there was a defined order before.

@flip1995 flip1995 added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 24, 2019
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the long wait time! We need to test these doc gen changes by hand, since it is not tested in the CI. This takes some time and motivation 😉 . Just tested this change locally and the documentation looks way cleaner with that change. Thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 10, 2019

📌 Commit 4ce100b has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 10, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 4ce100b with merge 0398c23...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2019
don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

changelog: don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

Fixes #4116.

This PR also switches the docs headings to deterministically display in the order that they are declared in the source, with "Configuration" always appearing last. It doesn't seem like there was a defined order before.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 10, 2019

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

failure caused by rust-lang/rust#62393 (comment)

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 4ce100b with merge 7102616...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2019
don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

changelog: don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

Fixes #4116.

This PR also switches the docs headings to deterministically display in the order that they are declared in the source, with "Configuration" always appearing last. It doesn't seem like there was a defined order before.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2019

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

flip1995 added a commit to flip1995/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
…ip1995

don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

changelog: don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

Fixes rust-lang#4116.

This PR also switches the docs headings to deterministically display in the order that they are declared in the source, with "Configuration" always appearing last. It doesn't seem like there was a defined order before.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
Rollup of 2 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #4229 (don't strip blank lines in lint documentation)
 - #4268 (Fix bug in `implicit_hasher` causing crashes)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 12, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 4ce100b with merge a22be98...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

changelog: don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

Fixes #4116.

This PR also switches the docs headings to deterministically display in the order that they are declared in the source, with "Configuration" always appearing last. It doesn't seem like there was a defined order before.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 12, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 12, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 4ce100b with merge d5934dc...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

changelog: don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

Fixes #4116.

This PR also switches the docs headings to deterministically display in the order that they are declared in the source, with "Configuration" always appearing last. It doesn't seem like there was a defined order before.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 12, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 13, 2019

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

  • This pull request previously failed. You should add more commits to fix the bug, or use retry to trigger a build again.
  • There's another pull request that is currently being tested, blocking this pull request: Fix bug in implicit_hasher causing crashes #4268

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 13, 2019

📌 Commit 4ce100b has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 13, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 4ce100b with merge 36fb646...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2019
don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

changelog: don't strip blank lines in lint documentation

Fixes #4116.

This PR also switches the docs headings to deterministically display in the order that they are declared in the source, with "Configuration" always appearing last. It doesn't seem like there was a defined order before.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 13, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 36fb646 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 4ce100b into rust-lang:master Jul 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

We shouldn't strip blank comments in code in lint doc generation
3 participants