Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Downgrade range_plus_one to pedantic #5057

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2020
Merged

Downgrade range_plus_one to pedantic #5057

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2020

Conversation

llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

@llogiq llogiq commented Jan 17, 2020

This fixes #2217

changelog: Downgrade [range_plus_one] to pedantic

Copy link
Member

@flip1995 flip1995 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

./util/dev fmt r=me with formatting

@llogiq llogiq force-pushed the pedantic_range_plus_one branch from c9ba495 to cb1092c Compare January 18, 2020 08:14
@llogiq llogiq force-pushed the pedantic_range_plus_one branch from cb1092c to ff5fb19 Compare January 18, 2020 08:40
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor Author

llogiq commented Jan 18, 2020

Rebased for rustup

@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor Author

llogiq commented Jan 18, 2020

@bors r=@flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2020

📌 Commit ff5fb19 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2020

⌛ Testing commit ff5fb19 with merge 7ae2442...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2020
Downgrade range_plus_one to pedantic

This fixes #2217

changelog: Downgrade [`range_plus_one`] to `pedantic`
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 7ae2442 to master...

@bors bors merged commit ff5fb19 into master Jan 18, 2020
@llogiq llogiq deleted the pedantic_range_plus_one branch January 18, 2020 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Do not suggest to use the closed interval syntax
3 participants