Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Downgrade rc_buffer to restriction #6128

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2020
Merged

Conversation

dtolnay
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay commented Oct 7, 2020

I think Arc<Vec<T>> and Arc<String> and similar are a totally reasonable data structure, as observed by others in the comments on #6044 as well. Doing Arc::make_mut(&mut self.vec).push(...) or Arc::make_mut(&mut self.string).push_str("...") is a terrific and well performing copy-on-write pattern. Linting this with an enabled-by-default performance lint strikes me as an unacceptable false positive balance.

As of #6090 the documentation of this lint now contains:

Known problems: This pattern can be desirable ...

which should indicate that we shouldn't be linting against correct, reasonable, well-performing patterns with an enabled-by-default lint.

Mentioning #6044, #6090.
r? @yaahc, who reviewed the lint.


changelog: Remove rc_buffer from default set of enabled lints

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 7, 2020
@yaahc yaahc requested a review from flip1995 October 7, 2020 23:09
@yaahc
Copy link
Member

yaahc commented Oct 7, 2020

lgtm

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2020

📌 Commit 0e159a5 has been approved by yaahc

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 0e159a5 with merge 13a80b3...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: yaahc
Pushing 13a80b3 to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants