Prefer explict closure sig types over expected ones

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/closure.rs

@@ -30,7 +30,12 @@ struct ExpectedSig<'tcx> {
 }
 
 struct ClosureSignatures<'tcx> {
+    /// The signature users of the closure see.
     bound_sig: ty::PolyFnSig<'tcx>,
+    /// The signature within the function body.
+    /// This mostly differs in the sense that lifetimes are now early bound and any
+    /// opaque types from the signature expectation are overriden in case there are
+    /// explicit hidden types written by the user in the closure signature.
     liberated_sig: ty::FnSig<'tcx>,
 }
 
@@ -444,18 +449,16 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
         // Along the way, it also writes out entries for types that the user
         // wrote into our typeck results, which are then later used by the privacy
         // check.
-        match self.check_supplied_sig_against_expectation(
+        match self.merge_supplied_sig_with_expectation(
             hir_id,
             expr_def_id,
             decl,
             body,
-            &closure_sigs,
+            closure_sigs,
         ) {
             Ok(infer_ok) => self.register_infer_ok_obligations(infer_ok),
-            Err(_) => return self.sig_of_closure_no_expectation(hir_id, expr_def_id, decl, body),
+            Err(_) => self.sig_of_closure_no_expectation(hir_id, expr_def_id, decl, body),
         }
-
-        closure_sigs
     }
 
     fn sig_of_closure_with_mismatched_number_of_arguments(
@@ -497,21 +500,22 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
     /// Enforce the user's types against the expectation. See
     /// `sig_of_closure_with_expectation` for details on the overall
     /// strategy.
-    fn check_supplied_sig_against_expectation(
+    #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, hir_id, expr_def_id, decl, body, expected_sigs))]
+    fn merge_supplied_sig_with_expectation(
         &self,
         hir_id: hir::HirId,
         expr_def_id: DefId,
         decl: &hir::FnDecl<'_>,
         body: &hir::Body<'_>,
-        expected_sigs: &ClosureSignatures<'tcx>,
-    ) -> InferResult<'tcx, ()> {
+        mut expected_sigs: ClosureSignatures<'tcx>,
+    ) -> InferResult<'tcx, ClosureSignatures<'tcx>> {
         // Get the signature S that the user gave.
         //
         // (See comment on `sig_of_closure_with_expectation` for the
         // meaning of these letters.)
         let supplied_sig = self.supplied_sig_of_closure(hir_id, expr_def_id, decl, body);
 
-        debug!("check_supplied_sig_against_expectation: supplied_sig={:?}", supplied_sig);
+        debug!(?supplied_sig);
 
         // FIXME(#45727): As discussed in [this comment][c1], naively
         // forcing equality here actually results in suboptimal error
@@ -529,23 +533,27 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
         // [c2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45072#issuecomment-341096796
         self.commit_if_ok(|_| {
             let mut all_obligations = vec![];
+            let inputs: Vec<_> = iter::zip(
+                decl.inputs,
+                supplied_sig.inputs().skip_binder(), // binder moved to (*) below
+            )
+            .map(|(hir_ty, &supplied_ty)| {
+                // Instantiate (this part of..) S to S', i.e., with fresh variables.
+                self.replace_bound_vars_with_fresh_vars(
+                    hir_ty.span,
+                    LateBoundRegionConversionTime::FnCall,
+                    // (*) binder moved to here
+                    supplied_sig.inputs().rebind(supplied_ty),
+                )
+            })
+            .collect();
 
             // The liberated version of this signature should be a subtype
             // of the liberated form of the expectation.
             for ((hir_ty, &supplied_ty), expected_ty) in iter::zip(
-                iter::zip(
-                    decl.inputs,
-                    supplied_sig.inputs().skip_binder(), // binder moved to (*) below
-                ),
+                iter::zip(decl.inputs, &inputs),
                 expected_sigs.liberated_sig.inputs(), // `liberated_sig` is E'.
             ) {
-                // Instantiate (this part of..) S to S', i.e., with fresh variables.
-                let supplied_ty = self.replace_bound_vars_with_fresh_vars(
-                    hir_ty.span,
-                    LateBoundRegionConversionTime::FnCall,
-                    supplied_sig.inputs().rebind(supplied_ty),
-                ); // recreated from (*) above
-
                 // Check that E' = S'.
                 let cause = self.misc(hir_ty.span);
                 let InferOk { value: (), obligations } =
@@ -564,7 +572,17 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                 .eq(expected_sigs.liberated_sig.output(), supplied_output_ty)?;
             all_obligations.extend(obligations);
 
-            Ok(InferOk { value: (), obligations: all_obligations })
+            let inputs = inputs.into_iter().map(|ty| self.resolve_vars_if_possible(ty));
+
+            expected_sigs.liberated_sig = self.tcx.mk_fn_sig(
+                inputs,
+                supplied_output_ty,
+                expected_sigs.liberated_sig.c_variadic,
+                hir::Unsafety::Normal,
+                Abi::RustCall,
+            );
+
+            Ok(InferOk { value: expected_sigs, obligations: all_obligations })
         })
     }
 

src/test/mir-opt/retag.main-{closure#0}.SimplifyCfg-elaborate-drops.after.mir

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ fn main::{closure#0}(_1: &[closure@main::{closure#0}], _2: &i32) -> &i32 {
         StorageLive(_3);                 // scope 0 at $DIR/retag.rs:+1:13: +1:15
         _3 = _2;                         // scope 0 at $DIR/retag.rs:+1:18: +1:19
         Retag(_3);                       // scope 0 at $DIR/retag.rs:+1:18: +1:19
-        _0 = _2;                         // scope 1 at $DIR/retag.rs:+2:9: +2:10
+        _0 = &(*_2);                     // scope 1 at $DIR/retag.rs:+2:9: +2:10
         Retag(_0);                       // scope 1 at $DIR/retag.rs:+2:9: +2:10
         StorageDead(_3);                 // scope 0 at $DIR/retag.rs:+3:5: +3:6
         return;                          // scope 0 at $DIR/retag.rs:+3:6: +3:6

src/test/ui/closure-expected-type/expect-fn-supply-fn.stderr

@@ -25,26 +25,26 @@ error[E0308]: mismatched types
 LL |     with_closure_expecting_fn_with_free_region(|x: fn(&u32), y| {});
    |                                                 ^ one type is more general than the other
    |
-   = note: expected fn pointer `for<'r> fn(&'r u32)`
-              found fn pointer `fn(&u32)`
+   = note: expected fn pointer `fn(&u32)`
+              found fn pointer `for<'r> fn(&'r u32)`
 
 error[E0308]: mismatched types
   --> $DIR/expect-fn-supply-fn.rs:39:50
    |
 LL |     with_closure_expecting_fn_with_bound_region(|x: fn(&'x u32), y| {});
    |                                                  ^ one type is more general than the other
    |
-   = note: expected fn pointer `fn(&'x u32)`
-              found fn pointer `for<'r> fn(&'r u32)`
+   = note: expected fn pointer `for<'r> fn(&'r u32)`
+              found fn pointer `fn(&u32)`
 
 error[E0308]: mismatched types
   --> $DIR/expect-fn-supply-fn.rs:48:50
    |
 LL |     with_closure_expecting_fn_with_bound_region(|x: Foo<'_>, y| {
    |                                                  ^ one type is more general than the other
    |
-   = note: expected fn pointer `fn(&u32)`
-              found fn pointer `for<'r> fn(&'r u32)`
+   = note: expected fn pointer `for<'r> fn(&'r u32)`
+              found fn pointer `fn(&u32)`
 
 error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
 

src/test/ui/closure-expected-type/expect-two-infer-vars-supply-ty-with-bound-region.stderr

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LL |     with_closure(|x: u32, y| {});
    |
 help: consider giving this closure parameter an explicit type
    |
-LL |     with_closure(|x: u32, y: B| {});
+LL |     with_closure(|x: u32, y: _| {});
    |                            +++
 
 error: aborting due to previous error

src/test/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/closure_args.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// check-pass
+
+// regression test for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100800
+
+#![feature(type_alias_impl_trait)]
+
+trait Anything {}
+impl<T> Anything for T {}
+type Input = impl Anything;
+fn run<F: FnOnce(Input) -> ()>(f: F, i: Input) {
+    f(i);
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    run(|x: u32| {println!("{x}");}, 0);
+}

src/test/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/closure_args2.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// run-pass
+
+#![feature(type_alias_impl_trait)]
+
+trait Foo {
+    // This was reachable in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100800
+    fn foo(&self) { unreachable!() }
+}
+impl<T> Foo for T {}
+
+struct B;
+impl B {
+    fn foo(&self) {}
+}
+
+type Input = impl Foo;
+fn run1<F: FnOnce(Input)>(f: F, i: Input) {f(i)}
+fn run2<F: FnOnce(B)>(f: F, i: B) {f(i)}
+
+fn main() {
+    run1(|x: B| {x.foo()}, B);
+    run2(|x: B| {x.foo()}, B);
+}

src/test/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-60371.stderr

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ error[E0277]: the trait bound `(): Bug` is not satisfied
   --> $DIR/issue-60371.rs:10:40
    |
 LL |     const FUN: fn() -> Self::Item = || ();
-   |                                        ^ the trait `Bug` is not implemented for `()`
+   |                                        ^^ the trait `Bug` is not implemented for `()`
    |
    = help: the trait `Bug` is implemented for `&()`