-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make check
broken on windows
#10452
Labels
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
O-windows
Operating system: Windows
Comments
My result with gcc 4.6:
gcc 4.8 result has 4 more failures due to #9205: we |
... because UAC (at least on win 8.1 preview) saw the word "update" in filename then blocked it. :( Others are just |
This was referenced Nov 14, 2013
klutzy
added a commit
to klutzy/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2013
Rename {struct-update,fsu}-moves-and-copies, since win32 failed to run the test since UAC prevents any executable whose name contaning "update". (rust-lang#10452) Some tests related to rust-lang#9205 are expected to fail on gcc 4.8, so they are marked as `xfail-win32` instead of `xfail-fast`. Some tests using `extra::tempfile` fail on win32 due to rust-lang#10462. Mark them as `xfail-win32`.
This was referenced Nov 16, 2013
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this issue
May 5, 2023
use `is_inside_const_context` for `in_constant` util fn Fixes rust-lang#10452. This PR improves the `in_constant` util function to detect more cases of const contexts. Previously this function would not detect cases like expressions in array length position or expression in an inline const block `const { .. }`. changelog: [`bool_to_int_with_if`]: recognize array length operand as being in a const context and don't suggest `usize::from` there
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
O-windows
Operating system: Windows
We only run
make check-fast
on windows due to slowness (#8844), but in theory it should work. It doesn't now.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: