unnormalized user annotations can be ill-formed #104764
Labels
A-borrow-checker
Area: The borrow checker
A-NLL
Area: Non-lexical lifetimes (NLL)
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
NLL-sound
Working towards the "invalid code does not compile" goal
T-types
Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
We're still not doing WF-checks on user annotations prior to normalization, so this code is still accepted:
I consider this a different issue than #101350 because it is a more long-standing problem and not strictly an NLL regression.
Originally posted by @aliemjay in #101947 (comment)
@rustbot label C-bug T-types A-borrow-checker A-NLL NLL-sound
@rustbot claim
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: