Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Change xfail directives in compiletests to ignore #11363

Closed
brson opened this issue Jan 7, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Change xfail directives in compiletests to ignore #11363

brson opened this issue Jan 7, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

Comments

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Jan 7, 2014

Similar to #11362. It's long bugged me that we use two different terms for this.
@wting
Copy link
Contributor

wting commented Jan 12, 2014

Are you referring to Markdown file ~~~ { .xfail-tests } directives should be replaced with ~~~ { .ignore }?

@fhahn fhahn mentioned this issue Feb 8, 2014
Merged
@fhahn fhahn mentioned this issue Feb 10, 2014
Merged
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2014
@bors
auto merge of #12110 : fhahn/rust/issue-11363-change-xfail, r=alexcri…
4c967e7 
…chton

Patch for #11363
@bors bors closed this as completed in f62460c Feb 11, 2014
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2014
@bors
auto merge of #12165 : fhahn/rust/change-some-tests, r=alexcrichton
58eeb07 
While working on #11363 I stumbled over a couple of ignored tests, that seem to be fixed or invalid.

* src/test/run-pass/issue-3559.rs was fixed in #4726
* src/test/compile-fail/borrowck-call-sendfn.rs was fixed in #2978
* update src/test/compile-fail/issue-5500-1.rs to work with current Rust (I'm not 100% sure if the original condition is tested as mentioned in #5500, but I think so)
* removed src/test/compile-fail/issue-5500.rs because it is tested in
    src/test/run-fail/issue-5500.rs (they are the same test cases, I just renamed src/test/run-fail/addr-of-bot.rs to be consistent with the other issue name
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2023
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#11363 - KisaragiEffective:fix_redundant_closu…
57397a5 
…re_call_on_closure_returns_async_block, r=llogiq

[`redundant_closure_call`]: avoid duplicated `async` keyword when triggering on closure that returns `async` block

close rust-lang#11357

----

*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*

changelog: [`redundant_closure_call`]: avoid duplicated `async` keyword when triggering on closure that returns `async` block
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@brson @wting