Skip to content

error in libstd docs when trying to examine method on extension to type outside of the target module #11800

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
olsonjeffery opened this issue Jan 25, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@olsonjeffery
Copy link
Contributor

Go to this point in the docs and click on is_dir. It results in an S3 error. I'm guessing this is because it's for a impl against path::Path, but because it's in std::io::fs it is choking. So the doc metadata is there, but something is missing? the mention of an extension for Path is missing std::io::fs, as well (actually that's not entirely true.. it's mentioned in the last paragraph of the intro-doc for the module).

Is this an already known issue?

@huonw
Copy link
Member

huonw commented Jan 25, 2014

Yep, it's a dupe: #10284

@huonw huonw closed this as completed Jan 25, 2014
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2023
Removing @Centri3 from reviewer rotation

Catherine decided that the best course of action would be to (maybe temporarily) remove her from the reviewer's rotation (but not unassign her from her current reviews). This PR does that. She'll always be welcomed back if she wants to review some more ❤️

> Alejandra González: [youremyfrennow.mp4](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/user_uploads/4715/7nE2W6cb8Q02gcK-vubvmsPM/youremyfrennow.mp4)
>
>Catherine, Fred (`@xFrednet` ) noticed that you aren't as active as in the summer, and proposed that maybe you preferred to be removed from the reviewer rotation. Don't worry, you aren't being taken out of the team, just wanted to know if you maybe preferred to not have those reviews pilling up (they can be pretty stressful to see).
>
>If you decide to step out of the reviewers rotation, you wouldn't be removed from the team, you just wouldn't have that responsability. Everyone takes break and that's fine, so yeah, if you want to not have to review PRs, let me know!
>
>So yeah, from weird teenager transfem to (probably weird) teenager transfem, the choice is in your hand.
>
>Alejandra González: meow meow ^•ﻌ•^
>
>Catherine (Centri3): Yeah that's probably best now, I'll still try with any I'm currently assigned to but I would prefer not to get anymore until then
>Catherine (Centri3): meow meow :3

changelog:none

r? `@Centri3`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants