Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand rustdoc docs to discuss doc conventions #12928

Closed
brson opened this issue Mar 16, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Expand rustdoc docs to discuss doc conventions #12928

brson opened this issue Mar 16, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

Comments

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Mar 16, 2014

rustdoc's docs mostly talk about technical topics, but not about how the docs should actually be written. Expand it with material from the old wiki page and updated conventions.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

I'm going to close this in favor of #14070 because it has so much more discussion, and they're basically identical.

flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2024
…efault, r=Alexendoo

Fix incorrect suggestion for `manual_unwrap_or_default`

Fixes rust-lang#12928.

If this not a "simple" pattern, better not emit the lint.

changelog: Fix incorrect suggestion for `manual_unwrap_or_default`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Jul 20, 2024
…efault, r=Alexendoo

Fix incorrect suggestion for `manual_unwrap_or_default`

Fixes rust-lang#12928.

If this not a "simple" pattern, better not emit the lint.

changelog: Fix incorrect suggestion for `manual_unwrap_or_default`
MabezDev pushed a commit to esp-rs/rust that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2024
…efault, r=Alexendoo

Fix incorrect suggestion for `manual_unwrap_or_default`

Fixes rust-lang#12928.

If this not a "simple" pattern, better not emit the lint.

changelog: Fix incorrect suggestion for `manual_unwrap_or_default`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants