-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
regression: overflow evaluating the requirement #130578
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
The suggestion to raise the recursion limit works, and also other crates in this workspace have already raised the recursion limit even further. And this is a regression using warp filters. |
Given this, I would accept this regression without looking into it myself, thanks @saethlin cc @rust-lang/types unsure whether you think we should FCP close this or if this ping is enough? |
Probably a ping is enough - I am curious what caused the regression though? Just a bisection is probably fine. Not a blocker. |
Bisects to #126024 |
the old solver does not track recursion depth in cache entries, so if we have:
If |
note: if the relevant team already accepted this breakage then this issue can be closed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: