-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion for "error[E0507]: cannot move out of a shared reference" suggests removing the wrong borrow #132806
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
A-suggestion-diagnostics
Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`
D-invalid-suggestion
Diagnostics: A structured suggestion resulting in incorrect code.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
@rustbot claim |
This was referenced Nov 23, 2024
Noratrieb
added a commit
to Noratrieb/rust
that referenced
this issue
Dec 31, 2024
…r=estebank borrowck diagnostics: make `add_move_error_suggestions` use the HIR rather than `SourceMap` This PR aims to fix rust-lang#132806 by rewriting `add_move_error_suggestions`[^1]. Previously, it manually scanned the source text to find a leading `&`, which isn't always going to produce a correct result (see: that issue). Admittedly, the HIR visitor in this PR introduces a lot of boilerplate, but hopefully the logic at its core isn't too complicated (I go over it in the comments). I also tried a simpler version that didn't use a HIR visitor and suggested adding `ref` always, but the `&ref x` suggestions really didn't look good. As a bonus for the added complexity though, it's now able to produce nice `&`-removing suggestions in more cases. I tried to do this such that it avoids edition-dependent checks and its suggestions can be applied together with those from the match ergonomics 2024 migration lint. I haven't added tests for that since the details of match ergonomics 2024 are still being sorted out, but I can try if desired once that's finalized. [^1]: In brief, it fires on patterns where users try to bind by-value in such a way that moves out of a reference to a non-Copy type (including slice references with non-copy elements). The suggestions are to change the binding's mode to be by-reference, either by removing[^2] an enclosing `&`/`&mut` or adding `ref` to the binding. [^2]: Incidentally, I find the terminology of "consider removing the borrow" a bit confusing for a suggestion to remove a `&` pattern in order to make bindings borrow rather than move. I'm not sure what a good, concise way to explain that would be though, and that should go in a separate PR anyway.
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 1, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#133486 - dianne:fix-move-error-suggestion, r=estebank borrowck diagnostics: make `add_move_error_suggestions` use the HIR rather than `SourceMap` This PR aims to fix rust-lang#132806 by rewriting `add_move_error_suggestions`[^1]. Previously, it manually scanned the source text to find a leading `&`, which isn't always going to produce a correct result (see: that issue). Admittedly, the HIR visitor in this PR introduces a lot of boilerplate, but hopefully the logic at its core isn't too complicated (I go over it in the comments). I also tried a simpler version that didn't use a HIR visitor and suggested adding `ref` always, but the `&ref x` suggestions really didn't look good. As a bonus for the added complexity though, it's now able to produce nice `&`-removing suggestions in more cases. I tried to do this such that it avoids edition-dependent checks and its suggestions can be applied together with those from the match ergonomics 2024 migration lint. I haven't added tests for that since the details of match ergonomics 2024 are still being sorted out, but I can try if desired once that's finalized. [^1]: In brief, it fires on patterns where users try to bind by-value in such a way that moves out of a reference to a non-Copy type (including slice references with non-copy elements). The suggestions are to change the binding's mode to be by-reference, either by removing[^2] an enclosing `&`/`&mut` or adding `ref` to the binding. [^2]: Incidentally, I find the terminology of "consider removing the borrow" a bit confusing for a suggestion to remove a `&` pattern in order to make bindings borrow rather than move. I'm not sure what a good, concise way to explain that would be though, and that should go in a separate PR anyway.
Thank you for fixing this @dianne! 🙇 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
A-suggestion-diagnostics
Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`
D-invalid-suggestion
Diagnostics: A structured suggestion resulting in incorrect code.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
I tried this code (playground):
I expected to see this happen:
Instead, this happened:
Diff between the two (red is actual, green is expected):
That is, it is suggesting removing the borrow on the tuple, which is not the correct borrow to remove; instead, it should suggest removing the borrow on
k
, the element that isn'tCopy
.Happens in playground nightly: 1.8.0-nightly (2024-11-08 59cec72)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: