Skip to content

Explain why {post,pre}-{increment,decrement} are absent in the language design FAQ. #14686

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
emberian opened this issue Jun 6, 2014 · 0 comments · Fixed by #23186
Closed

Explain why {post,pre}-{increment,decrement} are absent in the language design FAQ. #14686

emberian opened this issue Jun 6, 2014 · 0 comments · Fixed by #23186

Comments

@emberian
Copy link
Member

emberian commented Jun 6, 2014

The main argument I have in mind is evaluation order. No one likes sequence points. They are also almost entirely unnecessary, given our strong support for iterators.
@steveklabnik steveklabnik mentioned this issue Mar 8, 2015
Merged
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2015
@steveklabnik
Add note about pre/post increment to the design FAQ.
a600899 
Fixes rust-lang#14686
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2015
@bors
Auto merge of #23186 - steveklabnik:gh14686, r=alexcrichton
621ccf5 
Fixes #14686
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2023
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#14686 - matklad:matklad/angry-chain, r=Veykril
83cc5ef 
fix: don't wavy-underline iterator chains
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add note about pre/post increment to the design FAQ. steveklabnik/rust
2 participants
@steveklabnik @emberian