-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
relicense shootout-fasta-redux.rs
to the shootout license
#17078
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
shootout-nbody.rs
to the shootout licenseshootout-fasta-redux.rs
to the shootout license
@salemtalha ping |
I agree to relicense any previous contributions to http://github.com/rust-lang/rust according to the term of the Computer Language Benchmarks Game license (http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/license.php) |
TeXitoi
added a commit
to TeXitoi/rust
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2014
Everyone agreed. Fix rust-lang#17078
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2014
…=brson Everyone agreed. Fix #17078 #14248 seems completed, as every src/test/bench/shootout-*.rs are relicensed after acceptation of this PR except: - shootout-ackermann.rs: obsolete shootout bench - shootout-fibo.rs: obsolete shootout bench - shootout-k-nucleotide-pipes.rs: slower that shootout-k-nucleotide-pipes.rs (and not so interesting as a benchmark) - shootout-pfib.rs: does not seems related to the shootout @brson OK?
wizeman
pushed a commit
to wizeman/rust
that referenced
this issue
Sep 30, 2014
Everyone agreed. Fix rust-lang#17078
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 20, 2024
internal: Improve diagnostics performance
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 20, 2024
internal: Improve diagnostics performance
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
See #14248
I propose to change the license of
shootout-fasta-redux.rs
Non trivial contributors:
Contributors appearing in git blame that are trivial (except artifacts as empty lines):
Contributors with removed and trivial contributions are not considered.
For the persons that are not in "OK" state, please respond to this issue saying:
Then, I'll propose the corresponding PR.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: