Skip to content

Wrap the LLVM 'assume' intrinsic #18051

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
kmcallister opened this issue Oct 15, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Wrap the LLVM 'assume' intrinsic #18051

kmcallister opened this issue Oct 15, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
A-codegen Area: Code generation C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

Comments

@kmcallister
Copy link
Contributor

http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-assume-intrinsic

@kmcallister kmcallister added E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue. C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. A-codegen Area: Code generation labels Oct 15, 2014
veddan added a commit to veddan/rust that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2014
Adds an `assume` intrinsic that gets translated to llvm.assume. It is
used on a boolean expression and allows the optimizer to assume that
the expression is true.

This implements rust-lang#18051.
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2014
Adds an `assume` intrinsic that gets translated to llvm.assume. It is
used on a boolean expression and allows the optimizer to assume that
the expression is true.

This implements #18051.
@thestinger
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed by #18080.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-codegen Area: Code generation C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants