-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Resolve leaves import resolutions in an inconsistent state #31403
Comments
jseyfried
changed the title
Resolves leaves import resolutions in an inconsistent state
Resolve leaves import resolutions in an inconsistent state
Feb 4, 2016
This is caused by this code, which incorrectly reports that the import of |
jseyfried
referenced
this issue
in jseyfried/rust
Feb 8, 2016
…valued map. Refactor away resolve_name_in_module in resolve_imports.rs Rewrite and improve the core name resolution procedure in NameResolution::result and Module::resolve_name Refactor the duplicate checking code into NameResolution::try_define
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 11, 2016
This PR adds to `NameBinding` so it can more fully represent bindings from imports as well from items, refactors away `Target`, generalizes `ImportResolution` to a simpler type `NameResolution`, and uses a single `NameResolution`-valued map in place the existing maps `children` and `import_resolutions` (of `NameBinding`s and `ImportResolution`s, respectively), simplifying duplicate checking and name resolution. It also unifies the `resolve_name_in_module` in `lib.rs` with its namesake in `resolve_imports.rs`, clarifying and improving the core logic (fixes #31403 and fixes #31404) while maintaining clear future-comparability with shadowable globs (i.e., never reporting that a resolution is a `Success` or is `Failing` unless this would also be knowable with shadowable globs). Since it fixes #31403, this is technically a [breaking-change], but it is exceedingly unlikely to cause breakage in practice. The following is an example of code that would break: ```rust mod foo { pub mod bar {} // This defines bar in the type namespace pub use alpha::bar; // This defines bar in the value namespace // This should define baz in both namespaces, but it only defines baz in the type namespace. pub use self::bar as baz; pub fn baz() {} // This should collide with baz, but now it does not. } pub fn f() {} mod alpha { pub use self::f as bar; // Changing this to `pub fn bar() {}` causes the collision right now. pub use super::*; } ``` r? @nrc
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
For example,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: