-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bogus error when using ..
in struct expr with all fields present, in a const ("error[E0016]: blocks in constants are limited to items and tail expressions")
#39161
Labels
A-const-eval
Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
E-needs-test
Call for participation: An issue has been fixed and does not reproduce, but no test has been added.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
The provided code compiles fine both in 1.36 and the 2019-08-12 nightly. I did a quick search through the test suite and there's none for this particular case. Marking as such. @rustbot modify labels: E-needstest |
yerke
added a commit
to yerke/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 16, 2021
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 21, 2021
…ohnTitor Add regression test for issue rust-lang#39161 Closes rust-lang#39161 Based on feedback from `@JohnTitor` in rust-lang#71333 r? `@JohnTitor`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#85054 (Revert SGX inline asm syntax) - rust-lang#85182 (Move `available_concurrency` implementation to `sys`) - rust-lang#86037 (Add `io::Cursor::{remaining, remaining_slice, is_empty}`) - rust-lang#86114 (Reopen rust-lang#79692 (Format symbols under shared frames)) - rust-lang#86297 (Allow to pass arguments to rustdoc-gui tool) - rust-lang#86334 (Resolve type aliases to the type they point to in intra-doc links) - rust-lang#86367 (Fix comment about rustc_inherit_overflow_checks in abs().) - rust-lang#86381 (Add regression test for issue rust-lang#39161) - rust-lang#86387 (Remove `#[allow(unused_lifetimes)]` which is now unnecessary) - rust-lang#86398 (Add regression test for issue rust-lang#54685) - rust-lang#86493 (Say "this enum variant takes"/"this struct takes" instead of "this function takes") Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to tautschnig/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#85054 (Revert SGX inline asm syntax) - rust-lang#85182 (Move `available_concurrency` implementation to `sys`) - rust-lang#86037 (Add `io::Cursor::{remaining, remaining_slice, is_empty}`) - rust-lang#86114 (Reopen rust-lang#79692 (Format symbols under shared frames)) - rust-lang#86297 (Allow to pass arguments to rustdoc-gui tool) - rust-lang#86334 (Resolve type aliases to the type they point to in intra-doc links) - rust-lang#86367 (Fix comment about rustc_inherit_overflow_checks in abs().) - rust-lang#86381 (Add regression test for issue rust-lang#39161) - rust-lang#86387 (Remove `#[allow(unused_lifetimes)]` which is now unnecessary) - rust-lang#86398 (Add regression test for issue rust-lang#54685) - rust-lang#86493 (Say "this enum variant takes"/"this struct takes" instead of "this function takes") Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-const-eval
Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
E-needs-test
Call for participation: An issue has been fixed and does not reproduce, but no test has been added.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
X1
andx2
are allowed, but notX3
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: