-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tiny doc wording change #39366
Comments
Quickly did a search, seems like Maybe it is a convention? |
Yes, I hadn't considered that. It's self-evident that things are (metaphorically) put onto the stack , and maybe programmers adopted that expression for both. For the heap, in works too. Is there a difference in expressing data being written (on), and residing somewhere (in)? In the book, the section on the stack and heap appears to use on throughout. |
… r=alexcrichton Tiny doc wording change Fix rust-lang#39366
… r=alexcrichton Tiny doc wording change Fix rust-lang#39366
… r=alexcrichton Tiny doc wording change Fix rust-lang#39366
Sorry I accidentally close this via my PR, feel free to reopen this if you want. My unscientific checking shows that |
…ichton Tiny doc wording change Fix rust-lang/rust#39366
Sync > Condvar
Rather "determining that a thread"?
Alloc > Rc
Rather "allocated on the heap"? That's how it know it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: