You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Once #41141 lands, the compiler will compute the ICH for TypeCheckTables but when doing so, it will ignore the lints field. This is not a problem yet since we currently still unconditionally re-run type checking in incremental mode -- but in the future this could lead to wrong or dropped linting messages.
This should be addressed as part of refactoring the linting and error messaging system to better integrate with "on-demand" compilation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See also #42511 (refactor lint handling to be more eager) and #42513 (capture diagnostic output in queries). I think we would ultimately be hashing the "diagnostic" structures, not the existing lint stuff (as described in #42513).
Once #41141 lands, the compiler will compute the ICH for
TypeCheckTables
but when doing so, it will ignore thelints
field. This is not a problem yet since we currently still unconditionally re-run type checking in incremental mode -- but in the future this could lead to wrong or dropped linting messages.This should be addressed as part of refactoring the linting and error messaging system to better integrate with "on-demand" compilation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: