Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue for RFC #2094: non-lexical lifetimes #44928

Closed
aturon opened this issue Sep 29, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Tracking issue for RFC #2094: non-lexical lifetimes #44928

aturon opened this issue Sep 29, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented. C-tracking-issue Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Sep 29, 2017

This is a tracking issue for the RFC "non-lexical lifetimes" (rust-lang/rfcs#2094).

Duplicate of #43234

@aturon aturon added B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented. C-tracking-issue Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 29, 2017
@aturon
Copy link
Member Author

aturon commented Sep 29, 2017

Work is already underway as part of the impl period; I will let @nikomatsakis adjust the issue description with whatever checklist makes the most sense.

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Initial infrastructure: #45538

@mark-i-m
Copy link
Member

Prototype: #43234

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

closing in favor of #43234

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented. C-tracking-issue Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants