-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Conversion errors from &str to String should suggest .to_owned() instead #45777
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
C-enhancement
Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.
WG-diagnostics
Working group: Diagnostics
Comments
(See also #42929 for related discussion.) |
|
@steveklabnik thanks... man, do I wish rust wasn't 1.0 yet so all these naming issues could be cleaned up. |
zackmdavis
added a commit
to zackmdavis/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 7, 2018
Previously, on a type mismatch (and if this wasn't preëmpted by a higher-priority suggestion), we would look for argumentless methods returning the expected type, and list them in a `help` note. This had two major shortcomings. Firstly, a lot of the suggestions didn't really make sense (if you used a &str where a String was expected, `.to_ascii_uppercase()` is probably not the solution you were hoping for). Secondly, we weren't generating suggestions from the most useful traits! We address the first problem with an internal `#[rustc_conversion_suggestion]` attribute meant to mark methods that keep the "same value" in the relevant sense, just converting the type. We address the second problem by making `FnCtxt.probe_for_return_type` pass the `ProbeScope::AllTraits` to `probe_op`: this would seem to be safe because grep reveals no other callers of `probe_for_return_type`. Also, structured suggestions are preferred (because they're pretty, but also for RLS and friends). Also also, we make the E0055 autoderef recursion limit error use the one-time-diagnostics set, because we can potentially hit the limit a lot during probing. (Without this, test/ui/did_you_mean/recursion_limit_deref.rs would report "aborting due to 51 errors"). Unfortunately, the trait probing is still not all one would hope for: at a minimum, we don't know how to rule out `into()` in cases where it wouldn't actually work, and we don't know how to rule in `.to_owned()` where it would. Issues rust-lang#46459 and rust-lang#46460 have been filed and are ref'd in a FIXME. This is hoped to resolve rust-lang#42929, rust-lang#44672, and rust-lang#45777.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2018
…e, r=estebank type error method suggestions use whitelisted identity-like conversions  Previously, on a type mismatch (and if this wasn't preëmpted by a higher-priority suggestion), we would look for argumentless methods returning the expected type, and list them in a `help` note. This had two major shortcomings: firstly, a lot of the suggestions didn't really make sense (if you used a &str where a String was expected, `.to_ascii_uppercase()` is probably not the solution you were hoping for). Secondly, we weren't generating suggestions from the most useful traits! We address the first problem with an internal `#[rustc_conversion_suggestion]` attribute meant to mark methods that keep the "same value" in the relevant sense, just converting the type. We address the second problem by making `FnCtxt.probe_for_return_type` pass the `ProbeScope::AllTraits` to `probe_op`: this would seem to be safe because grep reveals no other callers of `probe_for_return_type`. Also, structured suggestions are pretty and good for RLS and friends. Unfortunately, the trait probing is still not all one would hope for: at a minimum, we don't know how to rule out `into()` in cases where it wouldn't actually work, and we don't know how to rule in `.to_owned()` where it would. Issues #46459 and #46460 have been filed and are ref'd in a FIXME. This is hoped to resolve #42929, #44672, and #45777.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
C-enhancement
Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.
WG-diagnostics
Working group: Diagnostics
Currently, attempting to compile code that expects a
String
while providing an&'static str
causes the following to be shown:I'm guessing that these suggestions are automatically generated/derived by the compiler, but none of them are good "generic" suggestions.
The compiler should probably suggest either
.to_owned()
or.into()
in this case instead.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: