Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Determine whether we need a node ID when resolving methods #4951

Closed
catamorphism opened this issue Feb 15, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

Determine whether we need a node ID when resolving methods #4951

catamorphism opened this issue Feb 15, 2013 · 4 comments
Labels
A-resolve Area: Name/path resolution done by `rustc_resolve` specifically C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup.

Comments

@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor

See FIXME (formerly XXX) in the item_trait case in resolve::resolve_item.

@msullivan
Copy link
Contributor

FIXME still there. We probably don't need a node_id, if it actually works...

@emberian
Copy link
Member

/cc @pcwalton

@huonw
Copy link
Member

huonw commented Nov 10, 2013

Triage: FIXME is still there. I guess having a NodeId would make other tooling easier, e.g. #8961 would likely be easier to fix if every method had an associated NodeId (since it would then not require (as much) special casing).

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

For future spelunkers, this is talking about

// FIXME #4951: Do we need a node ID here?

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-resolve Area: Name/path resolution done by `rustc_resolve` specifically C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants