Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rustdoc search returns non working links related to #[doc(alias = "...")] #50311

Closed
kumbayo opened this issue Apr 29, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
A-doc-alias Area: `#[doc(alias)]` T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@kumbayo
Copy link

kumbayo commented Apr 29, 2018

When searching for % https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/?search=%25
the search result shows std::ops::Rem::Rem
with a non working link to https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/ops/Rem/trait.Rem.html
(The same problem also happens for other aliases like ==, +=, ?, ...)

When searching for Rem https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/?search=Rem
the search result shows std::ops::Rem
with a working link to https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/ops/trait.Rem.html

Searching for aliases was implemented in #49757.
CC @GuillaumeGomez

Version reported by https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly
Version 1.27.0-nightly (66363b2 2018-04-28)

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez self-assigned this Apr 29, 2018
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 29, 2018
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this issue May 3, 2018
…ration, r=QuietMisdreavus

Fix invalid path generation in rustdoc search

Fixes rust-lang#50311.
@jyn514 jyn514 added the A-doc-alias Area: `#[doc(alias)]` label Sep 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-doc-alias Area: `#[doc(alias)]` T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants