Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

When linking against DLLs on Windows with MinGW, 'entry point not found' #5174

Closed
AngryLawyer opened this issue Feb 28, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

When linking against DLLs on Windows with MinGW, 'entry point not found' #5174

AngryLawyer opened this issue Feb 28, 2013 · 2 comments
Labels
O-windows Operating system: Windows
Milestone
0.7

Comments

@AngryLawyer
Copy link

So, after much wrangling with MinGW to get Rust to compile on my Windows partition, I'm trying to get Rust-SDL to work.

When compiling it, and then running the demo application, I get the following, somewhat esoteric message:

The procedure entry point _ZN4bool14__extensions__9meth_80572eq15_4e94be02e19a923_06E could not be located in the dynamic link library core-c3ca5d77d81b46c1-0.6.dll

Is this a configuration issue? A bug? Me being silly?
@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor

I'm suspecting this is a dup of #3660

@AngryLawyer
Copy link
Author

Well, that puts my mind to rest! Thanks @catamorphism!

flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this issue May 5, 2020
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#5558 - ThibsG:FixUnwrapInArgs, r=flip1995
75a7171 
Fix `unnecessary_unwrap` lint when checks are done in parameters

Fixes a false positive in `unnecessary_unwrap` lint when checks are done in macro parameters.

FIxes rust-lang#5174

changelog: Fixes a false positive in `unnecessary_unwrap` lint when checks are done in macro parameters.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
O-windows Operating system: Windows
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.7
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@catamorphism @AngryLawyer