-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wildcard imports do not seem to propagate as expected for tuple-like struct types having at least one non-pub field #53140
Comments
Very interesting. It's interesting that the error happens only if mod mod1 {
pub struct Item(usize);
use Item as Something; // ERROR
}
use mod1::*;
mod mod2 {
use Item; // OK
} Perhaps bisection can find what commit caused the regression? |
Applying |
Visiting for triage. Marking as P-high as this is a regression. @petrochenkov has already assigned themselves. |
…olution This allows import resolution to progress in cases like rust-lang#53140
Fixed in #53509 |
…olution This allows import resolution to progress in cases like #53140
"Wildcard imports do not seem to propagate as expected for tuple-like struct types having at least one non-pub field" <rust-lang/rust#53140>
In the following code,
::mod1::Item
is expected to be imported as::mod1::mod2::Item
via the following route:::mod1::Item
(the original definition)::Item
(byuse self::mod1::*
in the crate root)::mod1::mod2::Item
(byuse Item
in::mod1::mod2
)However, an “unresolved import” error is reported for the last
use
as shown below:(Playground)
Errors:
This issue can be reproduced in:
But not in:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: