-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Misleading documentation in std::option
module
#64844
Comments
jonas-schievink
added
C-bug
Category: This is a bug.
A-docs
Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools
labels
Sep 27, 2019
I'd accept a PR to change "pointer" to "reference" here. |
hman523
added a commit
to hman523/rust
that referenced
this issue
Sep 30, 2019
tmandry
added a commit
to tmandry/rust
that referenced
this issue
Sep 30, 2019
Fixed a misleading documentation issue rust-lang#64844 Made the suggested change from @steveklabnik on issue rust-lang#64844
tmandry
added a commit
to tmandry/rust
that referenced
this issue
Sep 30, 2019
Fixed a misleading documentation issue rust-lang#64844 Made the suggested change from @steveklabnik on issue rust-lang#64844
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 1, 2019
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #64377 (Add long error explanation for E0493) - #64786 (Use https for curl when building for linux) - #64828 (Graphviz debug output for generic dataflow analysis) - #64838 (Add long error explanation for E0550) - #64891 (Fix `vec![x; n]` with null raw fat pointer zeroing the pointer metadata) - #64893 (Zero-initialize `vec![None; n]` for `Option<&T>`, `Option<&mut T>` and `Option<Box<T>>`) - #64911 (Fixed a misleading documentation issue #64844) - #64921 (Add test for issue-64662) - #64923 (Add missing links for mem::needs_drop) Failed merges: - #64918 (Add long error explanation for E0551) r? @ghost
I think we can close this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The current
std::option
module states, thatWhich is obviously wrong. There are no null references (
&T
), but there may be raw null pointers (*const T
).Maybe the docs should have used the terminology of smart pointers, which would be less misleading and be correct 😄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: