-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
Closed
Labels
A-const-evalArea: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)A-stabilityArea: `#[stable]`, `#[unstable]` etc.Area: `#[stable]`, `#[unstable]` etc.C-enhancementCategory: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Description
The rustc_const_unstable
attribute currently does not check whether the function it is applied upon is indeed a const fn
. I feel like it should check that.
I recently made the mistake of forgetting to mark the function const: #69617 (comment)
ping @oli-obk
LukasKalbertodt and lcnr
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-const-evalArea: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)A-stabilityArea: `#[stable]`, `#[unstable]` etc.Area: `#[stable]`, `#[unstable]` etc.C-enhancementCategory: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.