Tracking Issue for NonNull<[T]>::slice_from_raw_parts

[SimonSapin]

This is a tracking issue for the NonNull<[T]>::slice_from_raw_parts method proposed in PR #71940.
The feature gates for the issue are #![feature(nonnull_slice_from_raw_parts)], and #![feature(const_nonnull_slice_from_raw_parts)] for using as a const fn.

API

impl<T> NonNull<[T]> {
  pub const fn slice_from_raw_parts(data: NonNull<T>, len: usize) -> Self;
}

Docs: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ptr/struct.NonNull.html#method.slice_from_raw_parts

Steps

• Implementation: Add len and slice_from_raw_parts to NonNull<[T]> #71940
• FCP: Tracking Issue for NonNull<[T]>::slice_from_raw_parts #71941 (comment)
• Stabilization PR

[m-ou-se]

@rfcbot merge

[rfcbot]

Team member @m-ou-se has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

• @Amanieu
• @BurntSushi
• @dtolnay
• @joshtriplett
• @m-ou-se
• @yaahc

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

[bstrie]

I'm willing to file the stabilization report for this if the library team is on board for stabilization.

[yaahc]

I'm willing to file the stabilization report for this if the library team is on board for stabilization.

I'd certainly appreciate one!

[rfcbot]

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

[rfcbot]

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

This will be merged soon.