Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Internal Compiler Error: 'assertion failed: (left != right) at compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/ty.rs:324:9 #84148

Closed
dwrensha opened this issue Apr 13, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #86010
Labels
A-parser Area: The parsing of Rust source code to an AST C-bug Category: This is a bug. glacier ICE tracked in rust-lang/glacier. I-ICE Issue: The compiler panicked, giving an Internal Compilation Error (ICE) ❄️ P-low Low priority regression-from-stable-to-stable Performance or correctness regression from one stable version to another. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@dwrensha
Copy link
Contributor

rustc panics on the following input, found by fuzz-rustc:

fn f(t:for<>t?
$ rustc bug.rs
error: this file contains an unclosed delimiter
 --> bug.rs:1:16
  |
1 | fn f(t:for<>t?
  |     -          ^
  |     |
  |     unclosed delimiter

thread 'rustc' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left != right)`
  left: `Token { kind: Question, span: bug.rs:1:14: 1:15 (#0) }`,
 right: `Question`', compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/ty.rs:324:9
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic

note: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug.

note: we would appreciate a bug report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/new?labels=C-bug%2C+I-ICE%2C+T-compiler&template=ice.md

note: rustc 1.53.0-nightly (a86612456 2021-04-11) running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

query stack during panic:
end of query stack
error: aborting due to previous error
@dwrensha dwrensha added C-bug Category: This is a bug. I-ICE Issue: The compiler panicked, giving an Internal Compilation Error (ICE) ❄️ T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 13, 2021
@dwrensha
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is a regression, introduced in #67820.

(Thanks cargo-bisect-rustc!)

cc @ecstatic-morse

@jyn514 jyn514 added A-parser Area: The parsing of Rust source code to an AST regression-from-stable-to-stable Performance or correctness regression from one stable version to another. labels Apr 13, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added the I-prioritize Issue: Indicates that prioritization has been requested for this issue. label Apr 13, 2021
@dwrensha
Copy link
Contributor Author

The ICE still happens if you close the parens:

fn f(t:for<>t?) 

@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

Assigning priority as discussed as part of the Prioritization Working Group procedure and removing I-prioritize.

@rustbot label -I-prioritize +P-low

@rustbot rustbot added P-low Low priority and removed I-prioritize Issue: Indicates that prioritization has been requested for this issue. labels Apr 14, 2021
fanninpm added a commit to fanninpm/glacier that referenced this issue Apr 16, 2021
Low priority

Issue: rust-lang/rust#84148
fanninpm added a commit to fanninpm/glacier that referenced this issue Apr 16, 2021
Low priority

Issue: rust-lang/rust#84148
@rust-lang-glacier-bot rust-lang-glacier-bot added the glacier ICE tracked in rust-lang/glacier. label Apr 19, 2021
@bors bors closed this as completed in 1bef90f Jun 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-parser Area: The parsing of Rust source code to an AST C-bug Category: This is a bug. glacier ICE tracked in rust-lang/glacier. I-ICE Issue: The compiler panicked, giving an Internal Compilation Error (ICE) ❄️ P-low Low priority regression-from-stable-to-stable Performance or correctness regression from one stable version to another. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants