Tracking issue for #![feature(rustdoc_internals)]
#90418
Labels
C-tracking-issue
Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC
requires-nightly
This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way.
S-tracking-perma-unstable
Status: The feature will stay unstable indefinitely.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
GuillaumeGomez
added
T-rustdoc
|
I thought we didn't need tracking issues for features not intended to be stabilized? |
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2021
…ature, r=camelid Create rustdoc_internals feature gate As suggested by `@camelid` [here](rust-lang#90398 (comment)), since `doc_keyword` and `doc_primitive` aren't meant to be stabilized, we could put them behind a same feature flag. This is pretty much what it would look like (needs to update the tests too). The tracking issue is rust-lang#90418. What do you think `@rust-lang/rustdoc` ?
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2021
…ature, r=camelid Create rustdoc_internals feature gate As suggested by ``@camelid`` [here](rust-lang#90398 (comment)), since `doc_keyword` and `doc_primitive` aren't meant to be stabilized, we could put them behind a same feature flag. This is pretty much what it would look like (needs to update the tests too). The tracking issue is rust-lang#90418. What do you think ``@rust-lang/rustdoc`` ?
Dylan-DPC
added
the
S-tracking-perma-unstable
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It'll group features that aren't meant to be stabilized like
doc_keywordanddoc_primitive.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: