Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

const-features can be both stable and unstable at the same time #91357

Open
RalfJung opened this issue Nov 29, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

const-features can be both stable and unstable at the same time #91357

RalfJung opened this issue Nov 29, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
A-const-eval Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...) A-stability Area: `#[stable]`, `#[unstable]` etc. C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Since #90896, the const_maybe_uninit_assume_init feature is in a strange limbo state: there are both stable and unstable methods with that feature gate. For regular stability we prevent that, but it seems for const-stability that check is missing.

Cc @rust-lang/wg-const-eval
@RalfJung RalfJung mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2021
Merged
@inquisitivecrystal inquisitivecrystal added A-const-eval Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...) A-const-fn A-stability Area: `#[stable]`, `#[unstable]` etc. C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-const-eval Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...) A-stability Area: `#[stable]`, `#[unstable]` etc. C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@RalfJung @inquisitivecrystal