cleanup: Unify find_use_placement approaches. #94941
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
E-easy
Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
E-mentor
Call for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Spawned off of: #94584 (comment)
The code for
find_use_placement
was at one point roughly the same as the algorithm used prior to PR #94584.PR #94584 changed things to use a more robust algorithm. But it didn't handle the
find_use_placement
code.The two could be brought into sync, as documented in a FIXME
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: