-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Remove the rust
tool
#9775
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
E-easy
Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Comments
Nominating. |
I'm going to do it. |
Done -- I'm just running a second round of tests after doing a clean build to make sure nothing is left behind, and then I'll submit a PR. |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2013
…walton r? @pcwalton Sadly, there's a lack of resources for maintaining the `rust` tool, and we decided in the 2013-10-08 Rust team meeting that it's better to remove it altogether than to leave it in a broken state. This deletion is without prejudice. If a person or people appear who would like to maintain the tool, we will probably be happy to resurrect it! Closes #9775
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this issue
May 20, 2023
`SpanlessEq` improvements fixes rust-lang#9775 Also includes a simplification to `consts::constant`'s interface since I was already touching the code. At the start of `eq_expr` the check: ```rust if !self.inner.allow_side_effects && left.span.ctxt() != right.span.ctxt() { return false; } ``` was removed. This was added in 49e2501 to handle `cfg` macros. This is better handled by the newly added `check_ctxt`. changelog: [various lints]: Don't consider different `cfg!` expansions to be the same unless they are for the same config. changelog: [various lints]: Don't consider the expansion of two different macros to be equal, even when they expand to the same token sequence. changelog: [various lints]: Don't consider two blocks to be equal if they contain disabled code or empty macro expansions, unless those section contain the exact same token sequence.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
E-easy
Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
As discussed, it has a lot of problems, no owner, we can't commit to fixing it for Rust 1.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: