Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify array::from_fn documentation #100462

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2022
Merged

Clarify array::from_fn documentation #100462

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2022

Conversation

zohnannor
Copy link
Contributor

I've seen quite a few of people on social media confused of where the length of array is coming from in the newly stabilized array::from_fn example.

This PR tries to clarify the documentation on this.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Aug 12, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 12, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @m-ou-se

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 12, 2022
@zohnannor zohnannor changed the title Clarify array:from_fn documentation Clarify array::from_fn documentation Aug 18, 2022
@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 8, 2022
@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Oct 23, 2022

This seems like a small clear win. I think we'd accept further elaboration as discussed, but it doesn't seem worth blocking on that.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 23, 2022

📌 Commit 289ad1a has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 23, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2022
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#100462 (Clarify `array::from_fn` documentation)
 - rust-lang#101644 (Document surprising and dangerous fs::Permissions behaviour on Unix)
 - rust-lang#103005 (kmc-solid: Handle errors returned by `SOLID_FS_ReadDir`)
 - rust-lang#103140 (Add diagnostic for calling a function with the same name with unresolved Macro)
 - rust-lang#103254 (rustdoc: do not filter out cross-crate `Self: Sized` bounds)
 - rust-lang#103347 (bootstrap: also create rustc-src component in sysroot)
 - rust-lang#103402 (Fix wrapped valid-range handling in ty_find_init_error)
 - rust-lang#103414 (Pretty print lifetimes captured by RPIT)
 - rust-lang#103424 (rustdoc: remove no-op CSS `.code-header { border-bottom: none }`)
 - rust-lang#103434 (Use functions for jump-to-def-background rustdoc GUI test)
 - rust-lang#103447 (`MaybeUninit`: use `assume_init_drop()` in the partially initialized array example)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit acc269d into rust-lang:master Oct 24, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 24, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2022
…n, r=scottmcm

improve array_from_fn documenation

Improves array::from_fn documentation
Fixes rust-lang#102609

There were also unresolved comments from [this PR rust-lang#100462](rust-lang#100462), which have been added to my PR
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2022
…n, r=scottmcm

improve array_from_fn documenation

Improves array::from_fn documentation
Fixes rust-lang#102609

There were also unresolved comments from [this PR rust-lang#100462](rust-lang#100462), which have been added to my PR
thomcc pushed a commit to tcdi/postgrestd that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2023
…tmcm

improve array_from_fn documenation

Improves array::from_fn documentation
Fixes #102609

There were also unresolved comments from [this PR #100462](rust-lang/rust#100462), which have been added to my PR
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants