-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information #101101
Conversation
f3c61d1
to
24cf766
Compare
and show some extra information when it happens in CTFE
24cf766
to
cf2c65b
Compare
7465f7d
to
1a1220c
Compare
// We are *not* reading a pointer. | ||
// If we can just ignore provenance, do exactly that. | ||
if Prov::OFFSET_IS_ADDR { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fact that OFFSET_IS_ADDR
also indicates whether we support plain reads from bytes with provenance seems like a logical jump. Even the docs for this const only say this:
If `false`, ptr-to-int casts are not supported. The offset *must* be relative in that case.
which is identifying ptr-to-int casts which someone familiar with Miri may be sure is different from a ptr-to-int transmute. So I think this jump from OFFSET_IS_ADDR
to "provenance can be discarded" isn't (clearly) documented anywhere that's easy to find, and it would be nice if these branches on the const were more clear.
Can we have something like Prov::can_discard_provenance()
or Prov::permits_ptr_int_transmute()
then branch on that in these places? Such a function would also be a good place to explain the connection.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah this is really not about casts any more, it is about transmutation. I have updated the docs.
There is a 1:1 correlation between "we can just ignore provenance and get a meaningful result" and "the offset is a pointer is the absolute address": the reason we can strip provenance is that the pointer offset is the absolute address, so revealing the pointer bytes to the interpreted program is meaningful.
I have updated the comment, I hope it is more clear now.
02091ba
to
c46e803
Compare
@bors r+ took some brain mangling to grok, even with the comments, but I don't think it can be improved, it's just a complex operation |
…oli-obk interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information Next step in the reaction to rust-lang#99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixes rust-lang/miri#2456. Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this: ``` = help: this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer = help: the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported ``` r? `@oli-obk`
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#95376 (Add `vec::Drain{,Filter}::keep_rest`) - rust-lang#100092 (Fall back when relating two opaques by substs in MIR typeck) - rust-lang#101019 (Suggest returning closure as `impl Fn`) - rust-lang#101022 (Erase late bound regions before comparing types in `suggest_dereferences`) - rust-lang#101101 (interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information) - rust-lang#101123 (Remove `register_attr` feature) - rust-lang#101175 (Don't --bless in pre-push hook) - rust-lang#101176 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS selectors for `.table-display`) - rust-lang#101180 (Add another MaybeUninit array test with const) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Adjust for supporting more implicit ptr-to-int transmutation This is the Miri side of rust-lang/rust#101101. Fixes #2456.
Adjust for supporting more implicit ptr-to-int transmutation This is the Miri side of rust-lang/rust#101101. Fixes #2456.
…=pnkfelix beta-backport of provenance-related CTFE changes This is all part of dealing with rust-lang#99923. The first commit backports the effects of rust-lang#101101. `@pnkfelix` asked for this and it turned out to be easy, so I think this is uncontroversial. The second commit effectively repeats rust-lang#99965, which un-does the effects of rust-lang#97684 and therefore means rust-lang#99923 does not apply to the beta branch. I honestly don't think we should do this; the sentiment in rust-lang#99923 was that we should go ahead with the change but improve diagnostics. But `@pnkfelix` seemed to request such a change so I figured I would offer the option. I'll be on vacation soon, so if you all decide to take the first commit only, then someone please just force-push to this branch and remove the 2nd commit.
Fixes model-checking#1615 Relevant changes to rustc: - rust-lang/rust#101483: Change to intrinsics. - rust-lang/rust#94075: Change to niche opt. - rust-lang/rust#101101: Method rename.
Fixes model-checking#1615 Relevant changes to rustc: - rust-lang/rust#101483: Change to intrinsics. - rust-lang/rust#94075: Change to niche opt. - rust-lang/rust#101101: Method rename. Co-authored-by: Adrian Palacios <73246657+adpaco-aws@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes #1615 Relevant changes to rustc: - rust-lang/rust#101483: Change to intrinsics. - rust-lang/rust#94075: Change to niche opt. - rust-lang/rust#101101: Method rename. Co-authored-by: Adrian Palacios <73246657+adpaco-aws@users.noreply.github.com>
…oli-obk interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information Next step in the reaction to rust-lang#99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixes rust-lang/miri#2456. Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this: ``` = help: this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer = help: the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported ``` r? ``@oli-obk``
…oli-obk interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information Next step in the reaction to rust-lang#99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixes rust-lang/miri#2456. Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this: ``` = help: this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer = help: the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported ``` r? ``@oli-obk``
Next step in the reaction to #99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixes rust-lang/miri#2456.
Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this:
r? @oli-obk