Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary PartialOrd and Ord #101545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2022

Conversation

TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki commented Sep 7, 2022

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @wesleywiser

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 7, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 7, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki force-pushed the remove-unnecessary-partialord-ord branch from a0bd7f9 to bdc865d Compare September 7, 2022 21:16
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 7, 2022

This PR changes MIR

cc @oli-obk, @RalfJung, @JakobDegen, @davidtwco, @celinval, @vakaras

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Sep 8, 2022

r? @oli-obk

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 8, 2022

📌 Commit bdc865d has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned oli-obk and unassigned wesleywiser Sep 8, 2022
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 8, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
…ord-ord, r=oli-obk

Remove unnecessary `PartialOrd` and `Ord`
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
…ord-ord, r=oli-obk

Remove unnecessary `PartialOrd` and `Ord`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#98933 (Opaque types' generic params do not imply anything about their hidden type's lifetimes)
 - rust-lang#101041 (translations(rustc_session): migrates rustc_session to use SessionDiagnostic - Pt. 2)
 - rust-lang#101424 (Adjust and slightly generalize operator error suggestion)
 - rust-lang#101496 (Allow lower_lifetime_binder receive a closure)
 - rust-lang#101501 (Allow lint passes to be bound by `TyCtxt`)
 - rust-lang#101515 (Recover from typo where == is used in place of =)
 - rust-lang#101545 (Remove unnecessary `PartialOrd` and `Ord`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 720a82d into rust-lang:master Sep 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 8, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki deleted the remove-unnecessary-partialord-ord branch September 8, 2022 18:58
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#98933 (Opaque types' generic params do not imply anything about their hidden type's lifetimes)
 - rust-lang#101041 (translations(rustc_session): migrates rustc_session to use SessionDiagnostic - Pt. 2)
 - rust-lang#101424 (Adjust and slightly generalize operator error suggestion)
 - rust-lang#101496 (Allow lower_lifetime_binder receive a closure)
 - rust-lang#101501 (Allow lint passes to be bound by `TyCtxt`)
 - rust-lang#101515 (Recover from typo where == is used in place of =)
 - rust-lang#101545 (Remove unnecessary `PartialOrd` and `Ord`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants