Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Account for late-bound lifetimes in generics #103448

Closed
wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

@cjgillot cjgillot commented Oct 23, 2022

Currently, functions have two kinds of lifetime parameters: early-bound (which appear in where clauses or do not appear in inputs), and late-bound. Late-bound lifetimes do not appear in generics, they only exist inside the function signature. For instance, take this code:

fn foo<'a, 'b, T>() where T: 'b {}
       ^^  ^^
     late  early

Then we have generics_of(foo) = ['b, T] and fn_sig(foo::<'b, T>) = for<'a> fn().

This PR proposes to make all lifetimes on functions early-bound.
The main motivation is to simplify RPIT and async desugaring, to be submitted as a separate PR (#103449).

To achieve that, all lifetimes are included when constructing generics_of. The early vs late distinction is still saved in GenericParamDefKind::Lifetime. The fn_sig query no longer returns an higher-ranked fn type, but a fn type with all lifetimes early-bound. The higher-ranked version is computed by Ty::fn_sig function by rebinding lifetimes based on GenericParamDefKind::Lifetime. The implicit decay from FnDef to higher-ranked fn is handled in type coercion.

This PR has to work around some the former difference in treatment between early- and late-bound lifetimes. Notably, changing the amount of late-bound lifetimes between trait and impl is allowed.

trait Foo<T> {
    fn foo(self, other: T);
}

impl<'a> Foo<&'a u8> for u8 {
    fn foo<'b>(self, other: &'b u8) {} // OK, even if `'b` did not exist in the trait.
}

This makes the current API around rebasing substs an impl to a trait a bit of a footgun. I shifted the late-bound lifetimes to the end of the generics to mitigate the impact. This may cause a issues with RPITIT, except if we disallow such liberties with RPITIT.

To simplify the implementation, I also make late_bound_lifetime_arguments lint (#42868) a hard error. That lint has been there for 5 years.

There are still a few edges to sand off here. I'll file an MCP depending on reception by the types team.
Still TODO:

  • verify what chalk does;
  • fortify the subts rebase_onto API.

r? types

@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 23, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 23, 2022

Some changes occurred in src/librustdoc/clean/types.rs

cc @camelid

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift

cc @bjorn3

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine

cc @rust-lang/miri

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 23, 2022
@oli-obk oli-obk added I-types-nominated Nominated for discussion during a types team meeting. T-types Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 23, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 24, 2022

The Miri subtree was changed

cc @rust-lang/miri

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #103337) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-tools failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
  IMAGE: x86_64-gnu-tools
##[endgroup]
From https://github.com/rust-lang/rust
 * branch              master     -> FETCH_HEAD
Searching for toolstate changes between 0a6b941df354c59b546ec4c0d27f2b9b0cb1162c and 3332f086add67442e68681ca485b54326d9effc3
Tool subtrees were updated
##[group]Run src/ci/scripts/verify-channel.sh
src/ci/scripts/verify-channel.sh
shell: /usr/bin/bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail {0}
env:
---
tests/fail/shims/sync/libc_pthread_rwlock_write_wrong_owner.rs ... ok
tests/fail/panic/double_panic.rs ... ok

tests/fail/stacked_borrows/newtype_pair_retagging.rs FAILED:
command: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools-bin/miri" "--error-format=json" "--edition" "2018" "-Astable-features" "-Aunused" "-Zui-testing" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--extern" "getrandom_1=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/libgetrandom-ac993ae34a47d010.rmeta" "--extern" "getrandom_2=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/libgetrandom-20b4cd671fbdd122.rmeta" "--extern" "libc=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/liblibc-5c91b8ee2f9a761f.rmeta" "--extern" "num_cpus=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/libnum_cpus-f87ab7e9e692ab6c.rmeta" "--extern" "page_size=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/libpage_size-c9761f548003f841.rmeta" "--extern" "rand=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/librand-5e75cbc746a2ceda.rmeta" "--extern" "tokio=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/libtokio-664c0f42e4d71cb6.rmeta" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/build/libc-19a0c4dd785bdb63" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/deps" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/build/quote-bbb475710904fa81" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/build/lock_api-2402edfbc2151f87" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/build/getrandom-dd8529f5bb54559b" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/build/tokio-5b679bca69988a36" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/build/log-5da2e714312fda90" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/build/syn-3bb8f7ac0d0402d5" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/build/parking_lot_core-de8d28cfa3a1467f" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/build/proc-macro2-eeb167ea843a342f" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/debug/build/memchr-3aa21f28168e754b" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps" "tests/fail/stacked_borrows/newtype_pair_retagging.rs" "-Zmiri-retag-fields=scalar"
actual output differed from expected
--- tests/fail/stacked_borrows/newtype_pair_retagging.stderr
+++ <stderr output>
... 24 lines skipped ...
... 24 lines skipped ...
 LL |             || drop(Box::from_raw(ptr)),
    |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
~note: inside `dealloc_while_running::<[closure@$DIR/newtype_pair_retagging.rs:LL:CC], '_>` at $DIR/newtype_pair_retagging.rs:LL:CC
    |
... 16 lines skipped ...



full stderr:
error: Undefined Behavior: not granting access to tag <3169> because that would remove [Unique for <3188>] which is protected because it is an argument of call 890
   |
LL |         Box(unsafe { Unique::new_unchecked(raw) }, alloc)
LL |         Box(unsafe { Unique::new_unchecked(raw) }, alloc)
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not granting access to tag <3169> because that would remove [Unique for <3188>] which is protected because it is an argument of call 890
   = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
   = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
   = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
help: <3169> was created by a SharedReadWrite retag at offsets [0x0..0x4]
   |
   |
LL |     let ptr = Box::into_raw(Box::new(0i32));
   |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: <3188> is this argument
   |
   |
LL | fn dealloc_while_running(_n: Newtype<'_>, dealloc: impl FnOnce()) {
   = note: BACKTRACE:
   = note: inside `std::boxed::Box::<i32>::from_raw_in` at /checkout/library/alloc/src/boxed.rs:1013:9
   = note: inside `std::boxed::Box::<i32>::from_raw` at /checkout/library/alloc/src/boxed.rs:957:18
note: inside closure at tests/fail/stacked_borrows/newtype_pair_retagging.rs:16:21
note: inside closure at tests/fail/stacked_borrows/newtype_pair_retagging.rs:16:21
  --> tests/fail/stacked_borrows/newtype_pair_retagging.rs:16:21
   |
LL |             || drop(Box::from_raw(ptr)),
   |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: inside `dealloc_while_running::<[closure@tests/fail/stacked_borrows/newtype_pair_retagging.rs:16:13: 16:15], '_>` at tests/fail/stacked_borrows/newtype_pair_retagging.rs:6:5
   |
LL |     dealloc();
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:04:12
   |     ^^^^^^^^^
   |     ^^^^^^^^^
note: inside `main` at tests/fail/stacked_borrows/newtype_pair_retagging.rs:14:9
  --> tests/fail/stacked_borrows/newtype_pair_retagging.rs:14:9
   |
LL | /         dealloc_while_running(
LL | |             Newtype(&mut *ptr, 0),
LL | |             || drop(Box::from_raw(ptr)),
LL | |         )

note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace

error: aborting due to previous error

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 27, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #103623) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2022
…d, r=nikomatsakis

avoid making substs of type aliases late bound when used as fn args

fixes rust-lang#47511
fixes rust-lang#85533
(although I did not know theses issues existed when i was working on this 🙃)

currently `Alias<...>` is treated the same as `Struct<...>` when deciding if generics should be late bound or early bound but this is not correct as `Alias` might normalize to a projection which does not constrain the generics.

I think this needs more tests before merging
more explanation of PR [here](https://hackmd.io/v44a-QVjTIqqhK9uretyQg?view)

Hackmd inline for future readers:
---

This assumes reader is familiar with the concept of early/late bound lifetimes. There's a section on rustc-dev-guide if not (although i think some details are a bit out of date)

## problem & background

Not all lifetimes on a fn can be late bound:
```rust
fn foo<'a>() -> &'a ();
impl<'a> Fn<()> for FooFnDef {
    type Output = &'a (); // uh oh unconstrained lifetime
}
```
so we make make them early bound
```rust
fn foo<'a>() -> &'a ();
impl<'a> Fn<()> for FooFnDef<'a> {// wow look at all that lifetimey
     type Output = &'a ();
}
```
(Closures have the same constraint however it is not enforced leading to soundness bugs, [rust-lang#84385](rust-lang#84385) implements this "downgrading late bound to early bound" for closures)

lifetimes on fn items are only late bound when they are "constrained" by the fn args:
```rust
fn foo<'a>(_: &'a ()) -> &'a ();
//               late bound, not present on `FooFnItem`
//               vv
impl<'a> Trait<(&'a (),)> for FooFnItem {
    type Output = &'a ();
}

// projections do not constrain inputs
fn bar<'a, T: Trait>(_: <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc) -> &'a (); //  early bound
                                                            //  vv
impl<'a, T: Trait> Fn<(<T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc,)> for BarFnItem<'a, T> {
    type Output = &'a ();
}
```

current logic for determining if inputs "constrain" a lifetime works off of HIR so does not normalize aliases. It also assumes that any path with no self type constrains all its substs (i.e. `Foo<'a, u32>` has no self type but `T::Assoc` does). This falls apart for top level type aliases (see linked issues):

```rust
type Alias<'a, T> = <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc;
//                      wow look its a path with no self type uwu
//                      i bet that constrains `'a` so it should be latebound
//                      vvvvvvvvvvv
fn foo<'a, T: Trait>(_: Alias<'a, T>) -> &'a ();
//                     `Alias` normalized to make things clearer
//                     vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
impl<'a, T: Trait> Fn<(<T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc,)> for FooFnDef<T> {
    type Output = &'a ();
    // oh no `'a` isnt constrained wah wah waaaah *trumbone noises*
    // i think, idk what musical instrument that is
}
```

## solution

The PR solves this by having the hir visitor that checks for lifetimes in constraining uses check if the path is a `DefKind::Alias`. If it is we ""normalize"" it by calling `type_of` and walking the returned type. This is a bit hacky as it requires a mapping between the substs on the path in hir, and the generics of the `type Alias<...>` which is on the ty layer.

Alternative solutions may involve calculating the "late boundness" of lifetimes after/during astconv rather than relying on hir at all. We already have code to determine whether a lifetime SHOULD be late bound or not as this is currently how the error for `fn foo<'a, T: Trait>(_: Alias<'a, T>) -> &'a ();` gets emitted.

It is probably not possible to do this right now, late boundness is used by `generics_of` and `gather_explicit_predicates_of` as we currently do not put late bound lifetimes in `Generics`. Although this seems sus to me as the long term goal is to make all generics late bound which would result in `generics_of(function)` being empty? [rust-lang#103448](rust-lang#103448) places all lifetimes in `Generics` regardless of late boundness so that may be a good step towards making this possible.
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2022
…d, r=nikomatsakis

avoid making substs of type aliases late bound when used as fn args

fixes rust-lang#47511
fixes rust-lang#85533
(although I did not know theses issues existed when i was working on this 🙃)

currently `Alias<...>` is treated the same as `Struct<...>` when deciding if generics should be late bound or early bound but this is not correct as `Alias` might normalize to a projection which does not constrain the generics.

I think this needs more tests before merging
more explanation of PR [here](https://hackmd.io/v44a-QVjTIqqhK9uretyQg?view)

Hackmd inline for future readers:
---

This assumes reader is familiar with the concept of early/late bound lifetimes. There's a section on rustc-dev-guide if not (although i think some details are a bit out of date)

## problem & background

Not all lifetimes on a fn can be late bound:
```rust
fn foo<'a>() -> &'a ();
impl<'a> Fn<()> for FooFnDef {
    type Output = &'a (); // uh oh unconstrained lifetime
}
```
so we make make them early bound
```rust
fn foo<'a>() -> &'a ();
impl<'a> Fn<()> for FooFnDef<'a> {// wow look at all that lifetimey
     type Output = &'a ();
}
```
(Closures have the same constraint however it is not enforced leading to soundness bugs, [rust-lang#84385](rust-lang#84385) implements this "downgrading late bound to early bound" for closures)

lifetimes on fn items are only late bound when they are "constrained" by the fn args:
```rust
fn foo<'a>(_: &'a ()) -> &'a ();
//               late bound, not present on `FooFnItem`
//               vv
impl<'a> Trait<(&'a (),)> for FooFnItem {
    type Output = &'a ();
}

// projections do not constrain inputs
fn bar<'a, T: Trait>(_: <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc) -> &'a (); //  early bound
                                                            //  vv
impl<'a, T: Trait> Fn<(<T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc,)> for BarFnItem<'a, T> {
    type Output = &'a ();
}
```

current logic for determining if inputs "constrain" a lifetime works off of HIR so does not normalize aliases. It also assumes that any path with no self type constrains all its substs (i.e. `Foo<'a, u32>` has no self type but `T::Assoc` does). This falls apart for top level type aliases (see linked issues):

```rust
type Alias<'a, T> = <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc;
//                      wow look its a path with no self type uwu
//                      i bet that constrains `'a` so it should be latebound
//                      vvvvvvvvvvv
fn foo<'a, T: Trait>(_: Alias<'a, T>) -> &'a ();
//                     `Alias` normalized to make things clearer
//                     vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
impl<'a, T: Trait> Fn<(<T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc,)> for FooFnDef<T> {
    type Output = &'a ();
    // oh no `'a` isnt constrained wah wah waaaah *trumbone noises*
    // i think, idk what musical instrument that is
}
```

## solution

The PR solves this by having the hir visitor that checks for lifetimes in constraining uses check if the path is a `DefKind::Alias`. If it is we ""normalize"" it by calling `type_of` and walking the returned type. This is a bit hacky as it requires a mapping between the substs on the path in hir, and the generics of the `type Alias<...>` which is on the ty layer.

Alternative solutions may involve calculating the "late boundness" of lifetimes after/during astconv rather than relying on hir at all. We already have code to determine whether a lifetime SHOULD be late bound or not as this is currently how the error for `fn foo<'a, T: Trait>(_: Alias<'a, T>) -> &'a ();` gets emitted.

It is probably not possible to do this right now, late boundness is used by `generics_of` and `gather_explicit_predicates_of` as we currently do not put late bound lifetimes in `Generics`. Although this seems sus to me as the long term goal is to make all generics late bound which would result in `generics_of(function)` being empty? [rust-lang#103448](rust-lang#103448) places all lifetimes in `Generics` regardless of late boundness so that may be a good step towards making this possible.
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2022
…d, r=nikomatsakis

avoid making substs of type aliases late bound when used as fn args

fixes rust-lang#47511
fixes rust-lang#85533
(although I did not know theses issues existed when i was working on this 🙃)

currently `Alias<...>` is treated the same as `Struct<...>` when deciding if generics should be late bound or early bound but this is not correct as `Alias` might normalize to a projection which does not constrain the generics.

I think this needs more tests before merging
more explanation of PR [here](https://hackmd.io/v44a-QVjTIqqhK9uretyQg?view)

Hackmd inline for future readers:
---

This assumes reader is familiar with the concept of early/late bound lifetimes. There's a section on rustc-dev-guide if not (although i think some details are a bit out of date)

## problem & background

Not all lifetimes on a fn can be late bound:
```rust
fn foo<'a>() -> &'a ();
impl<'a> Fn<()> for FooFnDef {
    type Output = &'a (); // uh oh unconstrained lifetime
}
```
so we make make them early bound
```rust
fn foo<'a>() -> &'a ();
impl<'a> Fn<()> for FooFnDef<'a> {// wow look at all that lifetimey
     type Output = &'a ();
}
```
(Closures have the same constraint however it is not enforced leading to soundness bugs, [rust-lang#84385](rust-lang#84385) implements this "downgrading late bound to early bound" for closures)

lifetimes on fn items are only late bound when they are "constrained" by the fn args:
```rust
fn foo<'a>(_: &'a ()) -> &'a ();
//               late bound, not present on `FooFnItem`
//               vv
impl<'a> Trait<(&'a (),)> for FooFnItem {
    type Output = &'a ();
}

// projections do not constrain inputs
fn bar<'a, T: Trait>(_: <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc) -> &'a (); //  early bound
                                                            //  vv
impl<'a, T: Trait> Fn<(<T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc,)> for BarFnItem<'a, T> {
    type Output = &'a ();
}
```

current logic for determining if inputs "constrain" a lifetime works off of HIR so does not normalize aliases. It also assumes that any path with no self type constrains all its substs (i.e. `Foo<'a, u32>` has no self type but `T::Assoc` does). This falls apart for top level type aliases (see linked issues):

```rust
type Alias<'a, T> = <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc;
//                      wow look its a path with no self type uwu
//                      i bet that constrains `'a` so it should be latebound
//                      vvvvvvvvvvv
fn foo<'a, T: Trait>(_: Alias<'a, T>) -> &'a ();
//                     `Alias` normalized to make things clearer
//                     vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
impl<'a, T: Trait> Fn<(<T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc,)> for FooFnDef<T> {
    type Output = &'a ();
    // oh no `'a` isnt constrained wah wah waaaah *trumbone noises*
    // i think, idk what musical instrument that is
}
```

## solution

The PR solves this by having the hir visitor that checks for lifetimes in constraining uses check if the path is a `DefKind::Alias`. If it is we ""normalize"" it by calling `type_of` and walking the returned type. This is a bit hacky as it requires a mapping between the substs on the path in hir, and the generics of the `type Alias<...>` which is on the ty layer.

Alternative solutions may involve calculating the "late boundness" of lifetimes after/during astconv rather than relying on hir at all. We already have code to determine whether a lifetime SHOULD be late bound or not as this is currently how the error for `fn foo<'a, T: Trait>(_: Alias<'a, T>) -> &'a ();` gets emitted.

It is probably not possible to do this right now, late boundness is used by `generics_of` and `gather_explicit_predicates_of` as we currently do not put late bound lifetimes in `Generics`. Although this seems sus to me as the long term goal is to make all generics late bound which would result in `generics_of(function)` being empty? [rust-lang#103448](rust-lang#103448) places all lifetimes in `Generics` regardless of late boundness so that may be a good step towards making this possible.
@spastorino
Copy link
Member

r? types

@rustbot rustbot assigned lcnr and unassigned spastorino Dec 19, 2022
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Dec 20, 2022

we should probably land

To simplify the implementation, I also make late_bound_lifetime_arguments lint (#42868) a hard error. That lint has been there for 5 years.

in a separate PR so we can sign off on it there in parallel to reviewing this PR.

@cjgillot cjgillot marked this pull request as draft January 15, 2023 10:56
@lcnr lcnr added S-waiting-on-team Status: Awaiting decision from the relevant subteam (see the T-<team> label). and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 15, 2023
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

in a separate PR so we can sign off on it there in parallel to reviewing this PR.

Marking it as blocked on this, also note that that pr linked above has been closed

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC added S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. and removed S-waiting-on-team Status: Awaiting decision from the relevant subteam (see the T-<team> label). labels May 17, 2023
@jackh726
Copy link
Member

jackh726 commented Jul 3, 2023

We discussed this in the types team planning meeting today (https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/326132-t-types.2Fmeetings/topic/2023-07-03.20planning.20meeting/near/372029871). We decided we'd like to have two deep dives related to this. First, a background on early/late lifetime distinctions, and second, a proposal on this change (or similar).

Going to unnominate for now, but we should definitely come back to this during the second deep dive.

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Aug 7, 2023

blocked on rust-lang/types-team#62, unnominating

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU removed the I-types-nominated Nominated for discussion during a types team meeting. label Aug 7, 2023
@lcnr lcnr removed the I-types-nominated Nominated for discussion during a types team meeting. label Aug 7, 2023
@cjgillot cjgillot closed this Oct 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-types Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.