Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust stabilization version to 1.65.0 for wasi fds #103734

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2022

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum commented Oct 29, 2022

See #103308 (comment) for this ask.

Backport of that PR to beta (1.65.0) will include a similar patch.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 29, 2022

r? @joshtriplett

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 29, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 29, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

We need another beta backport as #103802 has been merged, I guess?

Feel free to r=me not to get this stale.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

I believe I cherry-picked this into 1.66 already.

@bors r=JohnTitor

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 14, 2022

📌 Commit 5410ac1 has been approved by JohnTitor

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 14, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103439 (Show note where the macro failed to match)
 - rust-lang#103734 (Adjust stabilization version to 1.65.0 for wasi fds)
 - rust-lang#104148 (Visit attributes of trait impl items during AST validation)
 - rust-lang#104241 (Move most of unwind's build script to lib.rs)
 - rust-lang#104258 (Deduce closure signature from a type alias `impl Trait`'s supertraits)
 - rust-lang#104296 (Walk types more carefully in `ProhibitOpaqueTypes` visitor)
 - rust-lang#104309 (Slightly improve error message for invalid identifier)
 - rust-lang#104316 (Simplify suggestions for errors in generators.)
 - rust-lang#104339 (Add `rustc_deny_explicit_impl`)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#103484 (Add `rust` to `let_underscore_lock` example)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e309b79 into rust-lang:master Nov 15, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants