-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Normalize types when deducing closure signature from supertraits #104038
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Nov 6, 2022
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
super-norm-closure-sig
branch
from
November 6, 2022 02:07
75e2f7b
to
9a1043e
Compare
compiler-errors
commented
Nov 6, 2022
@@ -241,9 +242,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { | |||
if expected_sig.is_none() | |||
&& let ty::PredicateKind::Projection(proj_predicate) = bound_predicate.skip_binder() | |||
{ | |||
expected_sig = self.deduce_sig_from_projection( | |||
expected_sig = self.normalize_associated_types_in( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fold after deduce_sig_from_projection
so we only need to normalize the types that end up in the closure sig.
compiler-errors
changed the title
Normalize signature when deducing closure signature from supertraits
Normalize types when deducing closure signature from supertraits
Nov 6, 2022
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Nov 7, 2022
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2022
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#103757 (Mention const and lifetime parameters in error E0207) - rust-lang#103986 (Don't silently eat label before block in block-like expr) - rust-lang#104003 (Move some tests to more reasonable directories) - rust-lang#104038 (Normalize types when deducing closure signature from supertraits) - rust-lang#104052 (Fix `resolution_failure` ICE) - rust-lang#104090 (Modify comment syntax error) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Elaborated supertraits should be normalized, since there's no guarantee they don't contain projections 😅
Fixes #104025
r? types